Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coppens, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coppens, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 11(2) pp. 189-202, 1986
© 1986 Society of Pediatric Psychology

research-article

Cognitive Characteristics as Predictors of Children's Understanding of Safety and Prevention1

Nina M. Coppens2

College of Health Professions, University of Lowell

2All correspondence should be sent to Nina M. Coppens, College of Health Professions, University of Lowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854

Children's level of causal reasoning and cognitive style were considered as possible predictors of their understanding of safety and prevention. Individual interviews conducted with 112 children, aged 3 through 8 years, indicated that the ability to differentiate between safe and unsafe situations occurred prior to the ability to specify preventive measures. An accurate understanding of safety and prevention was related to higher levels of causal reasoning and to a reflective cognitive style. However, multiple regression analyses revealed that causal reasoning eliminated cognitive style as a significant predictor. In comparison to 6- to 8-year-olds, the variability in 3- to 5-year-olds' performance on the predictor measures explained more of the variance in their safety and prevention scores. These differences are discussed in terms of children's stage of development and the higher national rate of accidents among preschoolers compared to school-age children. Implications of the results for safety education programs and directions for future research are discussed.

Key words: children; development; cognitive; safety; prevention.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
E Petridou, S Kedikoglou, E Andrie, T Farmakakis, A Tsiga, M Angelopoulos, N Dessypris, and D Trichopoulos
Injuries among disabled children: a study from Greece
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2003; 9(3): 226 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel, M. L. Speltz, K. Jones, and P. Bardina
Unintentional Injury in Preschool Boys With and Without Early Onset of Disruptive Behavior
J. Pediatr. Psychol., December 1, 2002; 27(8): 727 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
J Sherrard, B J Tonge, and J Ozanne-Smith
Injury in young people with intellectual disability: descriptive epidemiology
Inj. Prev., March 1, 2001; 7(1): 56 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Journal of School NursingHome page
N. M. Coppens and D. M. Koziara
Children's Perceptions: Concerning School Injuries
The Journal of School Nursing, August 1, 1997; 13(3): 14 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.