Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guerin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gottfried, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guerin, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gottfried, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 12(4) pp. 595-609, 1987
© 1987 Society of Pediatric Psychology


research-article

Minnesota Child Development Inventories: Predictors of Intelligence, Achievement, and Adaptability1

Diana Guerin2, and Allen W. Gottfried

University of California, Los Angeles, California State University Fullerton

2All correspondence should be sent to Diana Guerin, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024

The cross-time consistency and validity of mothers' reports on the Minnesota Child Development Inventories were assessed in a longitudinal study from preschool through school entry years. Mothers (N=89–109) completed the Minnesota Child Development Inventory and the Minnesota Preschool Inventory when their children were 21/2 and 5 years of age, respectively. Childrens' intelligence, achievement, and adaptive functioning were measured during the ages of21/2 to 6 years. The major results showed that these inventories had considerable cross-time consistency and that they related positively and significantly to a variety of abilities measured objectively. The Minnesota Inventories had comparable predictive value and structure to that of objective tests, with language skills as the primary predictor of psychological performance at the school entry years. The clinical utility of these inventories was discussed.

Key words: Minnesota inventories (MCDI); maternal reports; preschoolers; intelligence; achievement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
K. M. La Paro and R. C. Pianta
Predicting Children's Competence in the Early School Years: A Meta-Analytic Review
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2000; 70(4): 443 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
H. Ireton and F. P. Glascoe
Assessin Children's Development Using Parents' Reports: The Child Development Inventory
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1995; 34(5): 248 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
L. W. Henderson and S. J. Meisels
Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children: A Multiple-Source Perspective
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1994; 18(2): 141 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
H. Ireton, G. Diamond, and J. Carney
Preschool Screening Using the Parent's Preschool Development Inventory Report
Assessment for Effective Intervention, July 1, 1993; 18(4): 269 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
F. Page Glascoe and K. E. Byrne
The Usefulness of the Developmental Profile-II in Developmental Screening
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 1993; 32(4): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
F. P. GLASCOE and K. E. BYRNE
The Accuracy of Three Developmental Screening Tests
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1993; 17(4): 368 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. C. Clemmer, T. J. Klifman, and S. Bradley-Johnson
Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Cognitive Ability Scales
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1992; 10(3): 265 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.