Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arenson, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Arenson, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 14(4) pp. 593-605, 1989
© 1989 Society of Pediatric Psychology


research-article

Childhood Cancer Stereotype: Impact on Adult Perceptions of Children1

Marilyn Stern3 and Edward Arenson2

State University of New York Albany, Albany Medical College

3All correspondence should be sent to Marilyn Stern, Department of Counseling Psychology, 1400 Washington Ave., State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12222.

Explored the possibility that biased expectations might affect how adults respond to children diagnosed as in remission from cancer. The presence of a childhood cancer stereotype was investigated experimentally by assessing reactions of undergraduates and medical students to children described with either an in remission from leukemia label (RLL) or healthy label (HL). RLL children were rated as less sociable, less cognitively competent, less behaviorally active and well behaved, less physically potent, littler, and less likely to adjust well to the future than HL children. Undergraduates and medical students generally did not differ in their ratings of RLL and HL children. Medical students reported that they were more familiar with childhood cancer than undergraduates; however, familiarity was not related to ratings of the RLL or HL children. Implications for further research and health education practices are considered.

Key words: childhood cancer; perceptions; stereotyping; medical students.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. van Ryn, D. Burgess, J. Malat, and J. Griffin
Physicians' Perceptions of Patients' Social and Behavioral Characteristics and Race Disparities in Treatment Recommendations for Men With Coronary Artery Disease
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2006; 96(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
M. van Ryn and D. Williams
Commentary
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2003; 60(4): 496 - 508.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. van Ryn and S. S. Fu
Paved With Good Intentions: Do Public Health and Human Service Providers Contribute to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health?
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2003; 93(2): 248 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
C. C. Gray and J. R. Rodrigue
Brief Report: Perceptions of Young Adolescents About a Hypothetical New Peer With Cancer: An Analog Study
J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 1, 2001; 26(4): 247 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. A. Wiens and B. O. Gilbert
A Reexamination of a Childhood Cancer Stereotype
J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2000; 25(3): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. B. Noll, M. A. Gartstein, K. Vannatta, J. Correll, W. M. Bukowski, and W. H. Davies
Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Functioning of Children With Cancer
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.