Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saylor, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pope, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saylor, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pope, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 15(4) pp. 557-569, 1990
© 1990 Society of Pediatric Psychology


other

Depends on Who You Ask: What Maximizes Participation of Families in Early Intervention Programs

Conway F. Saylor1, Nick Elksnin, Brian Andrew Farah and Judith A. Pope

Medical University of South Carolina, Minneapolis, Minnesota

1All correspondence should be sent to Conway F. Saylor, Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, South Carolina 29425

This two-part study was a preliminary investigation of the types of procedures that could be useful in maximizing the participation of families in early intervention programs for their special-needs infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. In Study 1, 64 professionals in the early intervention field completed a survey that described 29 potential techniques for maximizing participation of families. For each technique, the respondents endorsed whether they employed the procedure, or would if they could. In addition, they rated the expected effectiveness of each procedure. Verbal praise and encouragement were highly rated and almost universally in use, as were various types of written and resource materials. Tangible reinforcement was seldom employed and professional respondents tended to indicate that they did not expect that such techniques would be useful. In Study 2, 29 mothers of high-risk infants and toddlers currently in early intervention rated the same 29 procedures, but were significantly more likely to endorse the use of tangible reinforcers and logistical support. Comparisons among respondents from professional and parent samples were discussed, along with implications of the findings and necessary directions for future research in this area.

Key words: compliance; maximizing participation; early intervention.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.