Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Moreno, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 18(1) pp. 133-147, 1993
© 1993 Society of Pediatric Psychology


other

Measures of Children's Injuries: Self-Reported Versus Maternal-Reported Events with Temporally Proximal Versus Delayed Reporting1

Lizette Peterson2, Cynthia Harbeck and Addys Moreno

University of Missouri-Columbia

2All correspondence should be addressed to Lizette Peterson, Psychology Department, 210 McAlester Hall, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 63211

Although attention has recently been focused on understanding and preventing children's injuries, much controversy exists over the best data collection methods for examining child injuries. This study examined three methodological issues relevant to childhood injury data collection including the length of time children and parents can be expected to meaningfully recall injuries, whether the parent or child is a preferred informant about the injury, and the potential use of near injuries as a proxy measure for actual child injuries. Both children and their mothers were individually interviewed every 2 weeks for a total of 6 months about both injuries and near injuries. In addition, at the end of the 6-month period, they were asked to recall all injuries that occurred during those 6 months. Overall, children reported more injuries than mothers. Children recalled far fewer and mothers recalled slightly fewer events than had been reported in the biweekly interviews. There were fewer near injury than actual injury events reported, although this varied across categories, with some categories (e.g., car passenger injuries) having more near than actual injuries, and other categories (e.g., cuts, bumps, and bruises) having many more actual than near injuries reported. Limitations of the project are discussed and implications for future research advanced.

Key words: children; injuries; measurement; parent report; self-report.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
P P S Lee, A Mihailovic, L Rothman, M Mutto, M Nakitto, and A W Howard
Pedestrian injuries in school-attending children: a comparison of injury data sources in a low-income setting
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2009; 15(2): 100 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel and C. M. Brezausek
Chronic Maternal Depression and Children's Injury Risk
J. Pediatr. Psychol., November 1, 2008; 33(10): 1108 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel and C. M. Brezausek
Nocturnal Awakenings and Pediatric Injury Risk
J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2008; 33(3): 323 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. A. Morrongiello and S. Matheis
Understanding Children's Injury-risk Behaviors: The Independent Contributions of Cognitions and Emotions
J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2007; 32(8): 926 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
C. van Aken, M. Junger, M. Verhoeven, M. A. G. van Aken, and M. Dekovic
Externalizing Behaviors and Minor Unintentional Injuries in Toddlers: Common Risk Factors?
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2007; 32(2): 230 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel, C. M. Brezausek, and J. Belsky
Does Time Spent in Child Care Influence Risk for Unintentional Injury?
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2006; 31(2): 184 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel, A. L. Summerlin, M. L. Bounds, and B. A. Morrongiello
The Stamp-in-Safety Program: A Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Behaviors that Can Lead to Unintentional Playground Injury in a Preschool Setting
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2006; 31(2): 152 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. A. Morrongiello, L. Ondejko, and A. Littlejohn
Understanding Toddlers' In-Home Injuries: I. Context, Correlates, and Determinants
J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2004; 29(6): 415 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel, C. M. Brezausek, S. L. Ramey, and C. T. Ramey
Interactions Between Child Behavior Patterns and Parenting: Implications for Children's Unintentional Injury Risk
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2004; 29(2): 93 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. C. Schwebel and C. M. Brezausek
The Role of Fathers in Toddlers' Unintentional Injury Risk
J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2004; 29(1): 19 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. A. Morrongiello, C. Midgett, and R. Shields
Don't Run With Scissors: Young Children's Knowledge of Home Safety Rules
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2001; 26(2): 105 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
D. E Kohen, H. Soubhi, and P. Raina
Maternal reports of child injuries in Canada: trends and patterns by age and gender
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2000; 6(3): 223 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
P. Marsh and D. Kendrick
Using a diary to record near misses and minor injuries--which method of administration is best?
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 305 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.