Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 18(6) pp. 717-730, 1993
© 1993 Society of Pediatric Psychology

research-article

Methods of Evaluating Methylphenidate in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Acceptability, Satisfaction, and Compliance1

Charlotte Johnston2 and Stuart Fine

University of British Columbia

2All correspondence should be sent to Charlotte Johnston, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada

Compared two methods of evaluating methylphenidate (MPH) on measures of parental acceptance, satisfaction, and compliance with the treatment. Twenty-four 6- to 10-year-old children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) were randomly assigned to either a blind, placebo-controlled medication trial (MT) or to a typical clinical procedures (TCP) evaluation that was nonblind and without a placebo control. Ratings of satisfaction were significantly higher in the MT condition than in the TCP condition; however, all parents became more accepting of MPH after participating in an evaluation. Both during the evaluation and at 6-week and 3-month follow-ups, approximately 20% of cases were not complying with treatment. However, rates of compliance did not differ between the MT and TCP conditions.

Key words: methylpbenidate; treatment acceptability; consumer satisfaction; treatment compliance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Atten DisordHome page
S. V. Faraone, J. Biederman, and B. Zimmerman
An Analysis of Patient Adherence to Treatment During a 1-Year, Open-label Study of OROS(R) Methylphenidate in Children With ADHD
J Atten Disord, September 1, 2007; 11(2): 157 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
L. K. Leslie, J. Weckerly, D. Plemmons, J. Landsverk, and S. Eastman
Implementing the American Academy of Pediatrics Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnostic Guidelines in Primary Care Settings
Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 129 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
J. L. Ohan and C. Johnston
Reported Rates of Adherence to Medication Prescribed for Adolescents' Symptoms of ADHD
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, October 1, 2000; 5(4): 581 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. A. Kent, C. S. Camfield, and P. R. Camfield
Double-blind Methylphenidate Trials: Practical, Useful, and Highly Endorsed by Families
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1999; 153(12): 1292 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
J. B. Hale, J.-A. B. Hoeppner, M. B. DeWitt, D. L. Coury, D. G. Ritacco, and B. Trommer
Evaluating Medication Response in ADHD: Cognitive, Behavioral, and Single-Subject Methodology
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 1998; 31(6): 595 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Child NeurolHome page
H. N. Bawden, G. W. MacDonald, and S. Shea
Treatment of Children With Williams Syndrome With Methylphenidate
J Child Neurol, June 1, 1997; 12(4): 248 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.