Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2000, pp. 5-13
© 2000 Society of Pediatric Psychology

Effects of Early Middle Ear Effusion on Child Intelligence at Three, Five, and Seven Years of Age

Dale L. Johnson, PhD1, Paul R. Swank, PhD1, Mary J. Owen, MD2, Constance D. Baldwin, PhD2, Virgil M. Howie, MD2 and David P. McCormick, MD2

1 University of Houston, 2 University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

All correspondence should be sent to Dale L. Johnson, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, P.O. Box 1687, Houston, Texas 77204-5341. E-mail: dljohnson{at}uh.edu .

Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that children with prolonged middle ear effusion (MEE) during the first 3 years of life are at risk for cognitive delays or deficits.

Method: A prospective study enrolled 698 children from diverse backgrounds and controlled for eight demographic and environmental factors. Participants were recruited at birth and monitored for ear status frequently in the home; 379 children were assessed for cognition with the Stanford-Binet, 4th ed., at 3 years of age, 294 at 5 years, and 198 at 7 years.

Results: Using the SAS General Linear Models (GLM) procedure, we found a significant direct relation between duration of bilateral MEE and Stanford-Binet Composite and Nonverbal Reasoning/Visualization Factor scores at age 3, but not at age 5 or age 7. Statistical clustering analysis revealed four groups with different temporal patterns of MEE: Low MEE, Early MEE (peaking at 0-6 months), Later MEE (peaking at 6-12 months), and High MEE. GLM analyses revealed no direct effects, but several moderated effects, of MEE cluster on cognitive development at 3 years, but none at 5 or 7 years. In general, children in the Later MEE and High MEE groups appeared to be more adversely affected by bilateral MEE at 3 years, but effects were moderated in complex ways by socioeconomic status or home stimulation. Growth curve modeling across the three assessment periods showed no effects of total duration of MEE but did indicate that children in the Later MEE cluster had low scores at age 3 but caught up at ages 5 and 7.

Conclusions: Prolonged MEE, especially between 6 and 12 months, may put children at risk for cognitive delays at 3 years, but the risk effect is not strong and effects are no longer detectable at 5 or 7 years.

Key words: cognitive delays; middle ear effusion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. E. Roberts, M. R. Burchinal, and S. A. Zeisel
Otitis Media in Early Childhood in Relation to Children's School-Age Language and Academic Skills
Pediatrics, October 1, 2002; 110(4): 696 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
J. M. Perrin
Should We Operate on Children with Fluid in the Middle Ear?
N. Engl. J. Med., April 19, 2001; 344(16): 1241 - 1242.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.