Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speltz, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Omnell, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Speltz, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Omnell, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2000, pp. 185-190
© 2000 Society of Pediatric Psychology

Brief Report: Cognitive and Psychomotor Development of Infants With Orofacial Clefts

Matthew L. Speltz, PhD1, Marya C. Endriga, PhD2, Sarah Hill, DDS2, Catherine L. Maris, MA2, Karen Jones, PhD2 and M. Lena Omnell, DDS2,3

1 University of Washington School of Medicine, 2 Children's Hospital & Regional Medical Center, 3 University of Washington School of Dentistry

All correspondence should be sent to Matthew L. Speltz, University of Washington, Box 359300-CL-08, Seattle Washington 98105. E-mail: mspeltz{at}u.washington.edu . Marya C. Endriga is now at California State University-Sacramento; Catherine L. Maris is now at the University of California-Berkeley.

Objective: To compare at ages 3, 12, and 24 months the cognitive and psychomotor development of 29 infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP), 28 infants with cleft palate only (CPO), and a demographically matched comparison (COMP) group of 69 infants; to examine predictors of cognitive status at age 24 months in the cleft group.

Methods: Infants were administered the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), mother-infant interactions were observed, and medical records were reviewed.

Results: CLP and CPO groups scored lower than the COMP group on the BSID, but did not differ from one another. Cleft group infants scored lower than COMP group infants on BSID items assessing nonverbal and expressive language skills. Quality of maternal interaction predicted the 2-year Mental Development Index (MDI) scores of infants with clefts.

Conclusions: Infants with clefts show relative deficits in cognitive and psychomotor development. Cognitive deficits are apparent in nonverbal as well as verbal areas of performance.

Key words: orofacial clefts; infants; cognition; psychomotor development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. L. Cunningham
Is Cleft Lip and Palate Ever Isolated?: Phenotype Is in the Eye of the Beholder
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2007; 161(8): 811 - 812.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
M. L. Speltz, K. A. Kapp-Simon, M. Cunningham, J. Marsh, and G. Dawson
Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Review of Neurobehavioral Research and Theory
J. Pediatr. Psychol., December 1, 2004; 29(8): 651 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.