Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlquist, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlquist, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 8, 2001, pp. 513-523
© 2001 Society of Pediatric Psychology

Reliability and Validity of the Brief Behavioral Distress Scale: A Measure of Children's Distress During Invasive Medical Procedures

Cindy L. Tucker, PhD1,2, Keith J. Slifer, PhD1,2 and Lynnda M. Dahlquist, PhD3

1 Kennedy Krieger Institute, 2 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 3 University of Maryland Baltimore County

All correspondence should be sent to Cindy L. Tucker, Department of Behavioral Psychology, The Kennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. E-mail: tuckerc{at}kennedykrieger.org .

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of a new observational measure of children's procedure-related distress behaviors, the Brief Behavioral Distress Scale (BBDS), to provide clinicians with an efficient, economical alternative measure that does not depend on continuous interval coding.

Methods: Forty-eight randomly selected videotaped invasive medical procedures performed on children (ages 2 to 10 years) with chronic illness were coded with the BBDS and the Observation Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD). Reliability and validity analyses along with item analysis were conducted.

Results: Total distress scores of the BBDS were highly correlated with six of seven concurrent validity measures from multiple sources (i.e., OSBD, parent ratings, two nurse ratings, child self-report, and a physiological arousal measure, heart rate) (range r =.57-.76, p <.001-.0001). A robust association was found between the BBDS distress scores and OSBD total distress scores (r =.72, p <.0001). For two concurrent validity measures, the BBDS demonstrated stronger associations than did the OSBD. Interrater reliability was high for each BBDS distress behavior category.

Conclusions: Based on the findings reported, the BBDS is a reliable and valid measure of children's procedure-related distress with functional utility in both research and clinical settings.

Key words: children's pain; procedure-related distress; rating scale; invasive medical procedures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.