Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2002, pp. 177-189
© 2002 Society of Pediatric Psychology
Observed and Perceived Dyadic and Systemic Functioning in Families of Preadolescents With Spina Bifida
Loyola University of Chicago
All correspondence should be sent to Grayson N. Holmbeck, Loyola University of Chicago, Department of Psychology, 6525 N. Sheridan Road, Chicago, Illinois 60626. E-mail: gholmbe{at}luc.edu .
Objective: To examine dyadic and systemic family functioning across several domains (conflict, cohesion, and stress) in families of preadolescents with spina bifida in comparison to families of able-bodied preadolescents (8- and 9-year olds; n = 68 in each sample).
Methods: Mother-, father-, and child-reported questionnaire data and observational ratings of family behavior were employed.
Results: Findings revealed significant group and socioeconomic status (SES) differences, particularly for the observational family data. Compared to families of able-bodied children, families in the spina bifida sample were less cohesive and children from this sample were more passive during family interaction tasks. Additional analyses suggested that some of these significant associations between group status and family functioning were mediated by verbal IQ, indicating that a significant portion (42%-55%) of the overall group effect was due to variations in child cognitive functioning. Lower SES families demonstrated higher levels of observed mother-child conflict, less observed and perceived family cohesion, and more life events. Lower SES families from the spina bifida sample appear to be particularly at risk for lower levels of family cohesion.
Conclusions: Findings for the spina bifida sample support a resilience-disruption view (Costigan, Floyd, Harter, & McClintock, 1997) of systemic functioning in families of children with pediatric conditions.
Key words: spina bifida; physical disability; family; family system; SES; adolescence; conflict; cohesion; stress.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. P. R. Vermaes, J. R. M. Gerris, and J. M. A. M. Janssens Parents' Social Adjustment in Families of Children with Spina Bifida: A Theory-driven Review J. Pediatr. Psychol., November 1, 2007; 32(10): 1214 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Coakley, G. N. Holmbeck, and F. B. Bryant Constructing a Prospective Model of Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida: An Application of Optimal Data Analysis J. Pediatr. Psychol., November 1, 2006; 31(10): 1084 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. DeLucia and S. C. Pitts Applications of Individual Growth Curve Modeling for Pediatric Psychology Research J. Pediatr. Psychol., November 1, 2006; 31(10): 1002 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. N. Greenley, G. N. Holmbeck, and B. M. Rose Predictors of Parenting Behavior Trajectories Among Families of Young Adolescents with and without Spina Bifida J. Pediatr. Psychol., November 1, 2006; 31(10): 1057 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. N. Greenley, R. M. Coakley, G. N. Holmbeck, B. Jandasek, and K. Wills Condition-Related Knowledge Among Children with Spina Bifida: Longitudinal Changes and Predictors J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2006; 31(8): 828 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. C. Haber, J. K. Austin, G. R. Huster, K. A. Lane, and S. M. Perkins Relationships Between Differences in Mother-Father Perceptions and Self-Concept and Depression in Children With Epilepsy Journal of Family Nursing, February 1, 2003; 9(1): 59 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Coakley, G. N. Holmbeck, D. Friedman, R. N. Greenley, and A. W. Thill A Longitudinal Study of Pubertal Timing, Parent-Child Conflict, and Cohesion in Families of Young Adolescents With Spina Bifida J. Pediatr. Psychol., July 1, 2002; 27(5): 461 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|