Skip Navigation

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2004 29(8):579-590; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsh060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Clercq, B.
Right arrow Articles by Benoit, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Clercq, B.
Right arrow Articles by Benoit, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology vol. 29 no. 8 © Society of Pediatric Psychology 2004; all rights reserved.

Quality of Life in Children Surviving Cancer: A Personality and Multi-Informant Perspective

Barbara De Clercq, PhD (Student)1, Filip De Fruyt, PhD1, Hans M. Koot, PhD2 and Yves Benoit, MD, DSc3

1 Ghent University, 2 Erasmus University, Rotterdam, and 3 Pediatric Hemato-Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Ghent

All correspondence should be sent to Barbara De Clercq, Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Belgium. E-mail: BarbaraJ.DeClercq{at}ugent.be.

Objective To describe quality of life (QoL) of children surviving cancer in relation to their personality, using self- and maternal reports and examining differences with healthy referents. Method Sixty-seven children who survived childhood cancer were compared with eighty-one healthy children on QoL and personality characteristics. Results Children who survived cancer reported higher QoL than healthy children, whereas there were no differences for personality. Two main effects emerged for informant with children rating themselves as less neurotic and more conscientious than their mothers. The correspondence between mothers and children was substantially higher for survivors for QoL and personality ratings. QoL and trait measures share substantial variance, and personality traits significantly predict QoL. Parental personality ratings explained child QoL beyond children’s personality ratings. Conclusions Personality traits contribute to quality of life, indicating that personality significantly influences child’s quality of life beyond the experience of a negative life event such as surviving cancer and its treatment. From a diagnostic perspective, parental trait ratings are informative in addition to children’s ratings of personality to understand children’s QoL.

Key words: quality of life; personality; children; cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
J. W. Varni, C. Limbers, and T. M. Burwinkle
Literature Review: Health-related Quality of Life Measurement in Pediatric Oncology: Hearing the Voices of the Children
J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2007; 32(9): 1151 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
M. A. Cantrell
The Art of Pediatric Oncology Nursing Practice
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, May 1, 2007; 24(3): 132 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
C. Eiser and M. Jenney
Measuring quality of life
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 348 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
E. Van Hoecke, F. De Fruyt, B. De Clercq, P. Hoebeke, and J. Vande Walle
Internalizing and Externalizing Problem Behavior in Children with Nocturnal and Diurnal Enuresis: A Five-Factor Model Perspective
J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 1, 2006; 31(5): 460 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.