Skip Navigation

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2005 30(1):89-97; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsi020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reaman, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Reaman, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology vol. 30 no. 1 © Society of Pediatric Psychology 2005; all rights reserved.

Psychological Research in Childhood Cancer: The Children’s Oncology Group Perspective

F. Daniel Armstrong, PhD1 and Gregory H. Reaman, MD2

1 University of Miami School of Medicine, and 2 George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

All correspondence should be sent to Daniel Armstrong, Department of Pediatrics (D-820), P.O. Box 016820, Miami, Florida 33101. E-mail: darmstrong{at}miami.edu.

Objective To review benefits and barriers to psychological research on childhood cancer in multidisciplinary, multicenter clinical-trial cooperative groups and identify opportunities for research activities in the coming decade. Methods Review of progress of cooperative-group research in the Children’s Oncology Group and legacy groups and the contribution of psychological research to this effort. Results Multidisciplinary, multicenter clinical-trial cooperative groups offer opportunities for psychological research that may be impossible at local institutions. Benefits include collaboration with other disciplines, access to adequate numbers of participants, shared research infrastructure, and access to longitudinal cohorts. Barriers include cost, standardization and quality control, competition for limited resources, and authorship and publication challenges. Conclusions The inclusion of psychological research as a task of the multidisciplinary cooperative group contributes to a transdisciplinary science focused on cure of childhood cancer followed by optimal quality of survivorship. The focus of this research for the next decade should be on the development of intervention studies that address acute problems, lessen the impact of late effects of treatment, and ultimately prevent these effects by better diagnostic classification and targeted treatment. This focus should ultimately lead to translation of intervention research findings to standard of care in the larger childhood cancer community.

Key words: childhood cancer; cooperative groups; psychological research; transdisciplinary models; intervention research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. P. Daly and R. T. Brown
Scholarly Literature Review: Management of Neurocognitive Late Effects with Stimulant Medication
J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2007; 32(9): 1111 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. W. Wilson, B. G. Haik, and C. Rodriguez-Galindo
Socioeconomic Impact of Modern Multidisciplinary Management of Retinoblastoma
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): e331 - e336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
A. F. Patenaude and M. J. Kupst
Introduction to the Special Issue: Surviving Pediatric Cancer: Research Gains and Goals
J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2005; 30(1): 5 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.