Skip Navigation


Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access originally published online on February 23, 2005
Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2005 30(5):387-396; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsi062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/5/387    most recent
jsi062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacLaren, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacLaren, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology vol. 30 no. 5 © Society of Pediatric Psychology 2005; all rights reserved.

A Comparison of Distraction Strategies for Venipuncture Distress in Children

Jill E. MacLaren, MA1 and Lindsey L. Cohen, PhD2

1 West Virginia University and 2 Georgia State University

All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lindsey L. Cohen, Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, Georgia 30302–5010. E-mail: psyllc{at}langate.gsu.edu.

Received January 15, 2004; revisions received May 26, 2004 and July 3, 2004; accepted July 14, 2004

Objective To compare the effects of two pediatric venipuncture distress-management distraction strategies that differed in the degree to which they required children’s interaction. Methods Eighty-eight 1- to 7-year-old children receiving venipuncture were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: interactive toy distraction, passive movie distraction, or standard care. Distress was examined via parent, nurse, self-report (children over 4 years), and observational coding. Engagement in distraction was assessed via observational coding.ResultsChildren in the passive condition were more distracted and less distressed than children in the interactive condition. Although children in the interactive condition were more distracted than standard care children, there were no differences in distress between these groups. Conclusions Despite literature that suggests that interactive distraction should lower distress more than passive distraction, results indicate that a passive strategy might be most effective for children’s venipuncture. It is possible that children’s distress interfered with their ability to interact with the distractor.

Key words: distraction; pain; distress; venipuncture; intervention.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Chorney and Z. N. Kain
Behavioral Analysis of Children's Response to Induction of Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1434 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
L. M. Dahlquist, K. E. Weiss, L. Dillinger Clendaniel, E. F. Law, C. S. Ackerman, and K. D. McKenna
Effects of Videogame Distraction using a Virtual Reality Type Head-Mounted Display Helmet on Cold Pressor Pain in Children
J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 1, 2009; 34(5): 574 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
W. H. Kline, A. Turnbull, V. E. Labruna, L. Haufler, S. DeVivio, and P. Ciminera
Enhancing Pain Management in the PICU by Teaching Guided Mental Imagery: A Quality-Improvement Project
J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 22, 2009; (2009) jsp030v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
L. L. Cohen
Behavioral Approaches to Anxiety and Pain Management for Pediatric Venous Access
Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(Supplement_3): S134 - S139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
L. L. Cohen, K. Lemanek, R. L. Blount, L. M. Dahlquist, C. S. Lim, T. M. Palermo, K. D. McKenna, and K. E. Weiss
Evidence-based Assessment of Pediatric Pain
J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2008; 33(9): 939 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CMAJHome page
K. J. Farion MD, K. L. Splinter MD, K. Newhook BScN RN, I. Gaboury MSc, and W. M. Splinter MD
The effect of vapocoolant spray on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children: a randomized controlled trial
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 1, 2008; 179(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. L. Schechter, W. T. Zempsky, L. L. Cohen, P. J. McGrath, C. M. McMurtry, and N. S. Bright
Pain Reduction During Pediatric Immunizations: Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations
Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): e1184 - e1198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
K. Salmon, F. McGuigan, and J. K. Pereira
Brief Report: Optimizing Children's Memory and Management of an Invasive Medical Procedure: The Influence of Procedural Narration and Distraction
J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 1, 2006; 31(5): 522 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP NewsHome page
C. Kemp
Distraction strategies to reduce venipuncture distress
AAP News, August 1, 2005; 26(8): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.