Skip Navigation


Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2005
Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2006 31(7):724-736; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsj065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/7/724    most recent
jsj065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Online Psychological Treatment for Pediatric Recurrent Pain: A Randomized Evaluation

Carrie L. Hicks, PhD1, Carl L. von Baeyer, PhD1,2 and Patrick J. McGrath, OC, PhD, FRSC3,4

1 Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, 3 Departments of Psychology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, and 4 Departments of Psychology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry, IWK Health Centre

All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carrie L. Hicks, PhD, Mental Health Services - Victoria Square, Box 3003, Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada S6V 6G1. E–mail: carrie.hicks{at}shaw.ca.

Received March 5, 2004; revisions received June 22, 2004; accepted July 26, 2004

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a distance treatment delivered through Internet and telephone for pediatric recurrent pain. Methods Forty-seven participants (9–16 years of age) were randomly assigned to either an Internet-based treatment or a standard medical care waitlist. Treatment employed a Web-based manual for children and parents with weekly therapist contact by telephone or e-mail. At 1- and 3-month follow-ups, participants were assessed on the outcome variables of pain and quality of life. A 50% reduction in diary pain scores was considered clinically significant. Results Significant between-group differences were found: 71 and 72% of the treatment group achieved clinically significant improvement at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups, respectively, whereas only 19 and 14% of the control group achieved the criterion. No significant differences were found on the quality of life variable. Conclusions Distance methods have considerable potential for making effective treatments more accessible with lower associated costs.

Key words: abdominal pain; distance treatment; headache; Internet; online; pediatric; recurrent pain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
A. C. Long and T. M. Palermo
Brief Report: Web-based Management of Adolescent Chronic Pain: Development and Usability Testing of an Online Family Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program
J. Pediatr. Psychol., July 31, 2008; (2008) jsn082v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
T. M. Palermo
Editorial: Section on Innovations in Technology in Measurement, Assessment, and Intervention
J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 35 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.