Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curry, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Curry, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R. J., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology 4(4) pp. 345-352, 1979
© 1979 Society of Pediatric Psychology


research-article

The Utility of Behavior Checklist Ratings in Differentiating Developmentally Disabled from Psychiatrically Referred Children1

John F. Curry2 and Robert J. Thompson, Jr.

Duke University Medical Center

2All correspondence should be addressed to John F. Curry, P. O. Box 2906, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

The Missouri Children's Behavior Checklist ratings were obtained on 50 children referred to a child psychiatry clinic, 50 children referred to a developmental disabilities clinic, and 50 nonreferred controls. Samples were individually matched on age, sex, and socioeconomic status, with each sample consisting of 30 males and 20 females. As predicted, the psychiatric sample was rated significantly higher in problems related to aggression, activity level, and sleep disturbance than the developmental disabilities sample. Both referred groups were rated significantly higher than non-referred controls on these scales. On other behavioral dimensions, the developmentally disabled were similar to either the psychiatric or the control sample, but in sociability they were rated lower than either of the other groups. These findings, and separate analyses for each sex, are discussed in terms of the utility of the checklist method in discriminating between subgroups of referred children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.