Skip Navigation


Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access originally published online on July 3, 2009
Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2009 34(10):1084-1090; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/10/1084    most recent
jsp053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meints, K.
Right arrow Articles by de Keuster, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meints, K.
Right arrow Articles by de Keuster, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Brief Report: Don’t Kiss a Sleeping Dog: The First Assessment of "The Blue Dog" Bite Prevention Program

Kerstin Meints and Tiny de Keuster

University of Lincoln

All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kerstin Meints, MA, PhD, Reader in Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK. E-mail: kmeints{at}lincoln.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objective The authors attempted to remedy the current lack of empirically evaluated dog-bite prevention programs for children under 7 by assessing children's learning success with the "Blue Dog" CD. Methods Ninety-six 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children used the interactive CD in an initial exposure phase, a training and a testing phase. Half received verbal feedback, and the other half additional practice with parents. All children were re-tested after 2 weeks. Results There were significant increases in safe choices after the training phase at all ages, with older children performing better than younger children. Children still retained their ability to make safe choices after 2 weeks. Interestingly, children practicing with parents performed better than others when under 6 years. Verbal feedback did not play a role, the CD is equally effective without. Conclusions Children learned successfully about safe behavior with dogs; thus, the CD can help educate children about dog-bite prevention.

Key words: accidents and injuries; children; educational interventions; health behavior; prevention/control..

Received December 8, 2008; revision received May 23, 2009; accepted May 27, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.