Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-3
© 2002 Society of Pediatric Psychology
How to Build a Better Mousetrap: Introduction to the Special Issue on Methodology and Design
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
All correspondence should be sent to Robert B. Noll, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio 45229. E-mail: robert.noll@chmcc.org .
| Introduction |
|---|
Pediatric psychology is over 25 years old. Now, a systematic look at our research paradigms, including their strengths and weaknesses, might serve as an opportunity for us to recognize our many accomplishments. This systematic look could also provide us with ideas for future growth. With improvements in research methodology, we have more opportunities to influence public policy and the health care system. Our scientific contributions shape our clinical practice and facilitate our ability to improve the lives of children and families.
Much pediatric psychology research is published in the Journal of
Pediatric Psychology (JPP), a highly competitive journal. More than 80%
of the manuscripts submitted for publication to the journal are rejected,
despite the hundreds of hours and many years that culminate in one manuscript.
Methodological shortcomings are among the most prominent reasons for
rejection. Thus, the purpose of this special issue is to provide formal
guidance on improving
| Design and Methodological Issues |
|---|
| Novel Approaches to Pediatric Psychology Research |
|---|
| Contemporary Statistical Issues |
|---|
| Conclusions |
|---|
| References |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. N. Holmbeck Journal of Pediatric Psychology Statement of Purpose Section on Methodology J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 9 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
