Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bachanas, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nesheim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bachanas, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nesheim, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2001, pp. 331-342
© 2001 Society of Pediatric Psychology


Special Section: Children with HIV/AIDS and Their Families

Psychological Adjustment in Caregivers of School-Age Children Infected With HIV: Stress, Coping, and Family Factors

Pamela J. Bachanas, PhD1, Kristin A. Kullgren, PhD2, Katherine Suzman Schwartz, MA3, J. Stephen McDaniel, MD1, Joy Smith, MD1 and Steven Nesheim, MD1

1 Emory University School of Medicine, 2 St. Louis Children's Hospital, 3 Georgia State University

All correspondence should be sent to Pamela Bachanas, Emory University School of Medicine, Pediatric Infectious Disease Program, 341 Ponce de Leon Ave., Atlanta, Georgia 30308. E-mail: pbachan{at}emory.edu .

Objective: To assess for significant differences in psychological functioning between caregivers of HIV-infected children and caregivers of healthy children, and to examine the utility of applying a stress and coping model to caregivers of children with HIV disease.

Methods: Participants included caregivers of HIV-infected children (n = 36) and caregivers of a demographically matched control group of healthy children (n = 32). During their child's pediatric clinic visits, caregivers completed measures of psychological adjustment, stress, coping style, and family resources and support. They also completed a measure of their child's psychological adjustment.

Results: Caregiver psychological distress scores did not significantly differ between the HIV and control groups, and clinically significant rates of psychological distress were reported by more than a third of caregivers in both groups. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that independent of their child's illness status, stress and coping style were significant predictors of caregiver's psychological adjustment. In addition, caregiver psychological distress was a significant predictor of children's maladjustment.

Conclusions: High rates of psychological distress were observed in caregivers of children with HIV disease; however, similarly high rates of psychological adjustment problems were found in caregivers of healthy children. Caregivers who reported high levels of daily stress and emotion-focused coping styles tended to report more psychological distress. Further, caregivers who reported more psychological distress also reported more internalizing and more externalizing behavior problems in their children, regardless of the child's illness status. These findings reflect the impact of poverty and environmental stress on caregivers' adjustment.

Key words: pediatric HIV; coping; stress; psychological adjustment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
J. D. Bordeaux, K. A. Loveland, D. Lachar, J. Stehbens, T. S. Bell, S. Nichols, N. Amodei, K. B. Adkins, and the Hemophilia Growth and Development Study
Hemophilia Growth and Development Study: Caregiver Report of Youth and Family Adjustment to HIV Disease and Immunologic Compromise
J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2003; 28(3): 175 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.