Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaso, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaso, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2001, pp. 407-415
© 2001 Society of Pediatric Psychology

Using Process Evaluation to Describe a Hospital-Based Clinic for Children Coping With Medical Stressors

Susan Douglas Kelley, PhD1,2, Melissa Van Horn, PhD2 and David Ray DeMaso, MD2

1 Harvard Children's Initiative/Harvard University, 2 Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School

All correspondence should be sent to Susan Douglas Kelley, Children's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Fegan 8, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail: susan_d_kelley{at}harvard.edu .

Objective: To use process evaluation methods to describe the development of a hospital-based mental health clinic for children facing medical stressors.

Methods: Over a 21-month time period, we collected data regarding presenting concern, service use, and referral source using hospital administrative, clinic intake, and clinical records for 356 children.

Results: Nearly 90% of the children were referred to the clinic from sources within the hospital. With the exception of single session interventions, there were no differences in average length of services according to presenting concern. Hospital pediatric specialists and psychology consultants were the primary referrers to the program. Pediatric specialists referred more often for procedural concerns and chronic illness than other hospital referrers.

Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility and usefulness of a process evaluation approach in shaping clinical program directions, creating opportunities for collaboration with medical providers, and planning effectiveness research.

Key words: psychological intervention; medical stress; coping; process evaluation; tertiary care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.