Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharff, L.
Right arrow Articles by Masek, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scharff, L.
Right arrow Articles by Masek, B. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2002, pp. 109-119
© 2002 Society of Pediatric Psychology

A Controlled Study of Minimal-Contact Thermal Biofeedback Treatment in Children With Migraine

Lisa Scharff, PhD1, Dawn A. Marcus, MD2 and Bruce J. Masek, PhD1

1 Children's Hospital Boston, 2 University of Pittsburgh

All correspondence should be sent to Lisa Scharff, Pain Treatment Service, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail: lisa.scharff{at}tch.harvard.edu .

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of handwarming biofeedback (HWB) and stress management training in comparison to attention (handcooling, HCB) and wait-list control groups. Thermal biofeedback has been used in many pediatric migraine treatment studies and has demonstrated a consistent therapeutic effect. No published studies to date have compared this treatment modality with credible attention control using biofeedback technology.

Methods: Thirty-six children and adolescents (mean age: 12.8 years), as well as the mothers and fathers of these children enrolled in the study, were randomly assigned to the three groups. Thirty-four children completed treatment. Both treatment groups received four sessions of biofeedback training and a portable biofeedback device for home practice. Ratings of treatment credibility showed that the children rated the two treatments as equally credible. Assessment included anxiety and depression questionnaires for the children and both of their parents.

Results: Children who had been assigned to the HWB group were more likely to achieve clinical improvement in migraine after treatment than the children in the HCB group. Treatment gains were maintained up to 6 months after treatment. Home practice data reflected a general increase in temperature in the HWB group and a decrease in temperature for the HCB group.

Conclusions: The results of this study confirm the findings of earlier pediatric migraine biofeedback treatment studies and also provide support for the specific effect of treatments including stress management and HWB. Future studies with larger sample sizes will aid in delineating the appropriateness of HCB as a control treatment.

Key words: migraine; biofeedback; cognitive-behavioral treatment; children; adolescents; pediatric headache.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
A. Vasquez
Interventions Need to Be Consistent With Osteopathic Philosophy
J Am Osteopath Assoc, September 1, 2006; 106(9): 528 - 529.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
J. C. Licciardone and D. P. Russo
Blinding Protocols, Treatment Credibility, and Expectancy: Methodologic Issues in Clinical Trials of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
J Am Osteopath Assoc, August 1, 2006; 106(8): 457 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
C. L. Hicks, C. L. von Baeyer, and P. J. McGrath
Online Psychological Treatment for Pediatric Recurrent Pain: A Randomized Evaluation
J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 1, 2006; 31(7): 724 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. E. Logan and L. Scharff
Relationships Between Family and Parent Characteristics and Functional Abilities in Children with Recurrent Pain Syndromes: An Investigation of Moderating Effects on the Pathway from Pain to Disability
J. Pediatr. Psychol., December 1, 2005; 30(8): 698 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
J. C. I. Tsao and L. K. Zeltzer
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 1, 2005; 2(2): 149 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
A. E. Kazak
Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP), 1998-2002: Editor's Vale Dictum
J. Pediatr. Psychol., December 1, 2002; 27(8): 653 - 663.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.