Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 7, 2002, pp. 585-591
© 2002 Society of Pediatric Psychology
Psychological Differences Between Children With and Without Chronic Encopresis
University of Virginia, Health Sciences Center
All correspondence should be sent to Daniel J. Cox, Box 800-223, University of Virginia Health Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: djc4f{at}virginia.edu.
Objective: To validate a theoretical model of encopresis in terms of psychological factors that differentiates children with and without chronic encopresis and to identify scales that demonstrate these differences.
Methods: Eighty-six children with encopresis were compared to 62 nonsymptomatic children on five psychometric instruments. Differences in the mean scores and the percentages of children falling beyond preselected clinical thresholds were compared across the patient-control groups.
Results: Children with encopresis were found to have more
anxiety/depression symptoms, family environments with less expressiveness and
poorer organization, more attention difficulties, greater social problems,
more disruptive behavior, and poorer school performance (ps = .01
.001 on 15/20 subscales). There were no differences in self-esteem. On
those subscales where proportionately more encopretic children exceeded
clinical thresholds, approximately 20% more of the encopretic children
exceeded thresholds than control children.
Conclusions: As a group, children with encopresis differ from children without encopresis on a variety of psychological parameters. However, only a minority of children with encopresis demonstrated clinically significant elevations in these parameters. Identification and treatment of such clinical issues may enhance treatment efficacy.
Key words: encopresis; behavioral problems; family environment; children; biopsychosocial.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Joinson, J. Heron, R. Butler, A. Von Gontard, U. Butler, A. Emond, and J. Golding A United Kingdom Population-Based Study of Intellectual Capacities in Children With and Without Soiling, Daytime Wetting, and Bed-wetting Pediatrics, August 1, 2007; 120(2): e308 - e316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Joinson, J. Heron, U. Butler, A. von Gontard, and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Childre Psychological Differences Between Children With and Without Soiling Problems Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): 1575 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G S Clayden, A S Keshtgar, I Carcani-Rathwell, and A Abhyankar THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC CONSTIPATION AND RELATED FAECAL INCONTINENCE IN CHILDHOOD Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., October 1, 2005; 90(3): ep58 - ep67. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Pashankar and V. Loening-Baucke Increased Prevalence of Obesity in Children With Functional Constipation Evaluated in an Academic Medical Center Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): e377 - e380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Reuchlin-Vroklage, S. Bierma-Zeinstra, M. A. Benninga, and M. Y. Berger Diagnostic Value of Abdominal Radiography in Constipated Children: A Systematic Review Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2005; 159(7): 671 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schonwald and L. Rappaport Consultation with the Specialist: Encopresis: Assessment and Management Pediatr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(8): 278 - 283. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Cox, L. M. Ritterband, W. Quillian, B. Kovatchev, J. Morris, J. Sutphen, and S. Borowitz Assessment of Behavioral Mechanisms Maintaining Encopresis: Virginia Encopresis-Constipation Apperception Test J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2003; 28(6): 375 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




