Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Routh, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Routh, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2003, pp. 41-43
© 2003 Society of Pediatric Psychology

Commentary: Juvenile Rheumatic Disease as a Psychosocial Stressor

Donald K. Routh, PhD

Estero, Florida

All correspondence should be sent to Donald K. Routh, 20131 Seagrove St., #402, Estero, Florida. E-mail: drouth@miami.edu.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Certain Hindu scriptures advise us not to be too attached to the fruits of our actions (Smith, 1965Go). Thus, in terms of scientific strategies, we should do our research carefully, using the highest methodological standards, and accept the results, whatever they are, with equanimity. Manuscript reviewers should ask themselves primarily whether a study is sufficiently rigorous in its design and, in making their recommendations to the editor, disregard whether it had significant or meaningful results. Let the chips fall where they may, in other words. According to this view, those who survey the literature should accept into their database only well-designed studies that have passed scientific peer review, as required for publication in reputable journals.

Another view of science, attributed to Paul Feyerabend (1993Go) among others, is that there is no such thing as a "scientific" method. Science means using whatever ingenious ways we can devise to find . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?