Skip Navigation


Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access originally published online on April 18, 2007
Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2007 32(5):517-526; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsm014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/5/517    most recent
jsm014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barton, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schwebel, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barton, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schwebel, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Roles of Age, Gender, Inhibitory Control, and Parental Supervision in Children's Pedestrian Safety

Benjamin K. Barton, PhD and David C. Schwebel, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham

All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Benjamin K. Barton, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada, E-mail: bbarton{at}uoguelph.ca


   Abstract

Objective Thousands of American children are injured or killed each year as pedestrians, but behavioral factors in pedestrian injury etiology remain poorly understood. We examined the roles of children's individual differences (age, gender, and inhibitory control) and parental supervision in children's pedestrian behaviors. Methods Using the pretend road method, a sample of 85 children and 26 adults crossed a pretend crosswalk set adjacent to a real road. Safety of crossing the pretend road was determined based on actual traffic on the real road. Adults also crossed the real road. Results Adults’ behavior on the real road paralleled that on the pretend road, supporting validity of the method. On the pretend road, younger children, boys, and children with less behavioral control engaged in riskier pedestrian behaviors. Children with less behavioral control responded more noticeably to increases in parental supervision. Conclusion Results are discussed in relation to children's development and injury prevention.

Key words: inhibitory control; injury etiology; parental supervision; pedestrian injuries; unintentional injuries.

Received June 16, 2006; revision received September 18, 2006; revision received December 21, 2006; accepted December 26, 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. Stavrinos, K. W. Byington, and D. C. Schwebel
Effect of Cell Phone Distraction on Pediatric Pedestrian Injury Risk
Pediatrics, February 1, 2009; 123(2): e179 - e185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.