Skip Navigation


Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access originally published online on November 26, 2008
Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2009 34(1):1-3; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn123
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/1/1    most recent
jsn123v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drotar, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drotar, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Editorial: Thoughts on Improving the Quality of Manuscripts Submitted to the Journal of Pediatric Psychology: Writing a Convincing Introduction

Dennis Drotar, PhD

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dennis Drotar, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLS 7039, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA. E-mail: dennis.drotar@cchmc.org

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

I want to share with you some observations and "things I would like to see" in submitted manuscripts that are based on my experience over the last two years as incoming editor of the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP), previous experience in editing and providing reviews, and feedback from JPP's associate editors. The second in a series of editorials, this one focuses on suggestions to enhance the quality of an introduction to a manuscript. My hope is that this will be useful to authors as well as reviewers in evaluating the quality of manuscripts.

Authors face a formidable challenge in crafting a convincing introduction. In a few pages authors need to clarify the relevance of their research to the field of pediatric psychology, specify the focus, primary . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   Clarify the Relevance of Research to the Field of Pediatric Psychology
 

   Specify the Focus of the Research
 

   Present a Clear Research Question and Explicit Hypotheses
 

   Establish the Significance of the Work to Pediatric Psychology and Child Health
 

   Use a Framework/Theoretical Model to Guide Research
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. Drotar
Editorial: How to Write an Effective Results and Discussion for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology
J. Pediatr. Psychol., May 1, 2009; 34(4): 339 - 343.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. Drotar
Editorial: How to Report Methods in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology
J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2009; 34(3): 227 - 230.
[Full Text] [PDF]