Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access originally published online on August 13, 2008
Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2009 34(5):585-587; doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn088
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Commentary: Electronic Communication in the Pediatric Setting—Dilemmas Associated with Patient Blogs
Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School
All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rachel Tunick, Children's Hospital Boston, Hospital Library, 300 Longwood Ave., Fegan Plaza, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: rachel.tunick@childrens.harvard.edu
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Advances in communication and technology have posed serious challenges to some of the fundamental ethical principles upon which psychologists operate, including the protection of patient privacy and confidentiality and the ideals of beneficence and nonmaleficence. In pediatric settings, efforts have been made to limit inadvertent dissemination of personal information in public areas such as hallways, cafeterias, elevators, and hospital emergency departments (Olsen & Sabin, 2003
; Patient privacy, 2004
; Ubel et al., 1995
). Likewise, legislation (The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, HIPAA, 1996
) now imposes standards around electronic transmission of protected health information, and psychologists are addressing privacy and confidentiality concerns in the context of computer-mediated clinical services (Drotar et al., 2006
). However, recent phenomena in electronic communication,
| Privacy/Confidentiality of Other Patients |
|---|
| Professional Reactions/Reputations |
|---|
| Privacy of Child/Family |
|---|
| Therapeutic Boundaries |
|---|
| To Read or Not to Read: Guidelines and Recommendations |
|---|