Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access published online on February 23, 2005
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsi047
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objective To examine how childrens injury attributions and coping strategies relate to procedure-related distress during unplanned medical procedures (laceration repair). Methods Children (N = 50) with minor lacerations were assessed from emergency department admittance until discharge. Childrens attributions of causes regarding their injury were assessed, and the Procedural Behavior Checklist was administered to each child (to assess coping strategies and procedure-related distress). Results Internally focused attributions of blame correlated with higher distress. Overall, children who reported primary-control coping, as opposed to secondary-control coping and relinquished-control coping, exhibited more pain during the procedure. Children who reported secondary-control coping, as opposed to relinquished-control coping, reported less pain after the procedure. Conclusions Injury attributions and coping style are significant factors in childrens pain experiences. These results suggest that self-blame may heighten subsequent pain experiences. In addition, similar coping strategies appear to be adaptive for unplanned medical procedures as have been found for planned medical procedures.
Received January 1, 2004
Revised August 10, 2004
Accepted August 11, 2004
Article
Attributions and Coping in Childrens Pain Experiences
2 Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, and
3 Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine
David A. Langer, E-mail: dalanger{at}ucla.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?