Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access published online on August 24, 2005
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsj069
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Texas Tech University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objective To assess whether natural variations in decosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels in breast milk would relate to infant neurobehavioral outcomes at the newborn stage following equivocal findings on infant and toddler outcomes of exposure to DHA in formula and breast milk. Methods Breast milk samples from N = 20 mothers were collected 9 days after delivery, while the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) was administered on the infant. Milk samples were later analyzed for fatty acids, including DHA. Results Pearson correlations revealed a positive association between DHA concentrations in breast milk and infants scores on the NBAS Range of State cluster score, suggesting that DHA is related to the infants superior ability to maintain optimal arousal. Conclusions These results suggest that breast milk DHA is beneficial to the neonates neurobehavioral functioning and call for investigative attention to DHAs role in potentiating optimized intellectual functioning at later stages of development. The findings may also be interpreted as supporting formula supplementation with DHA.
Received July 12, 2003
Revised April 18, 2004
Accepted July 1, 2004
Brief Report
Brief Report: Newborn Behavior Differs with Decosahexaenoic Acid Levels in Breast Milk
2 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Sybil L. Hart, E-mail: sybil.hart{at}ttu.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Engel, G. S. Berkowitz, D. B. Barr, S. L. Teitelbaum, J. Siskind, S. J. Meisel, J. G. Wetmur, and M. S. Wolff Prenatal Organophosphate Metabolite and Organochlorine Levels and Performance on the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale in a Multiethnic Pregnancy Cohort Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2007; 165(12): 1397 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
