Skip Navigation



Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access published online on May 22, 2006

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsj124
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/2/206    most recent
jsj124v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Claar, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Claar, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received October 22, 2004
Revised March 9, 2006
Accepted April 12, 2006

Article

Appraisal and Coping with Daily Stressors by Pediatric Patients with Chronic Abdominal Pain

Lynn S. Walker PhD 1 *, Craig A. Smith PhD 2, Judy Garber PhD 2, and Robyn Lewis Claar PhD 3

1 Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
2 Vanderbilt University
3 Children’s Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lynn S. Walker, E-mail: lynn.walker{at}vanderbilt.edu


   Abstract

Objective To test the hypothesis that pain patients differ from well children in their appraisal and coping with daily stressors and to test a model of the relation of stress appraisal and coping to symptoms and disability. Methods Pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain (n = 143) and well children (n = 104) completed a 5-day diary study regarding their appraisal and coping with daily stressors. Somatic symptoms, depressive symptoms, and functional disability were assessed 2 months later. Results Compared to well children, pain patients were less confident of their ability either to change or to adapt to stress and were less likely to use accommodative coping strategies. Different patterns of stress appraisal were associated with active, passive, and accommodative coping. Both appraisals and coping were significantly related to symptoms and disability. Conclusions The relation between stress and symptoms in pediatric pain patients may be explained in part by their appraisal and coping with stressors. The relation between appraisal and coping was consistent with Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.

Keywords: abdominal pain; accommodative coping; appraisal; passive coping; stress.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
K. J. Kaczynski, R. L. Claar, and D. E. Logan
Testing Gender as a Moderator of Associations Between Psychosocial Variables and Functional Disability in Children and Adolescents with Chronic Pain
J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 1, 2009; 34(7): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
B. Hood, T. Power, and L. Hill
Children's appraisal of moderately stressful situations
International Journal of Behavioral Development, March 1, 2009; 33(2): 167 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
M. A. McOmber and R. J. Shulman
Pediatric Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Nutr Clin Pract, June 1, 2008; 23(3): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
J. E. Beck
A Developmental Perspective on Functional Somatic Symptoms
J. Pediatr. Psychol., June 1, 2008; 33(5): 547 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.