Skip Navigation



Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access published online on May 17, 2006
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsl001
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/1/6    most recent
jsl001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Motl, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pate, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Motl, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pate, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received September 19, 2005
Revised April 24, 2006
Accepted April 25, 2006

Article

Perceptions of Physical and Social Environment Variables and Self-Efficacy as Correlates of Self-Reported Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls

Robert W. Motl PhD 1 *, Rod K. Dishman PhD 2, Ruth P. Saunders PhD 3, Marsha Dowda DrPH 4, and Russell R. Pate PhD 4

1 Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
2 Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia
3 Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of South Carolina
4 Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robert W. Motl, E-mail: robmotl{at}uiuc.edu


  Abstract

Objective This cross-sectional study examined the direct and indirect effects of perceived equipment accessibility, neighborhood safety, and social support on self-reported physical activity among older adolescent girls. Methods Adolescent girls (n = 1,655) who were in the 12th grade completed a battery of questionnaires that included self-report measures of the perceived physical environment, social support, barriers self-efficacy, and physical activity. Results Perceived neighborhood safety did not exhibit direct or indirect effects on self-reported physical activity. Perceived equipment accessibility exhibited an indirect effect on self-reported physical activity that was accounted for by barriers self-efficacy. Perceived social support exhibited direct and indirect effects on self-reported physical activity; the indirect effect was accounted for by barriers self-efficacy. The relationships were independent of parental education and body mass index (BMI). Conclusions Perceived physical environmental factors indirectly influenced self-reported physical activity, and perceived social environmental factors both directly and indirectly influenced self-reported physical activity in this sample of older adolescent girls.

Keywords: adolescents; body mass index; determinants; physical activity; race.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
R. K. Dishman, R. P. Saunders, R. W. Motl, M. Dowda, and R. R. Pate
Self-Efficacy Moderates the Relation Between Declines in Physical Activity and Perceived Social Support in High School Girls
J. Pediatr. Psychol., May 1, 2009; 34(4): 441 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
P. Taymoori, R. E. Rhodes, and T. R. Berry
Application of a social cognitive model in explaining physical activity in Iranian female adolescents
Health Educ. Res., October 20, 2008; (2008) cyn051v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.