Skip Navigation



Journal of Pediatric Psychology Advance Access published online on December 20, 2006

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsl049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/5/501    most recent
jsl049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pillai Riddell, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pillai Riddell, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Judgments of Infant Pain: The Impact of Caregiver Identity and Infant Age

Rebecca R. Pillai Riddell1,2 and Kenneth D. Craig3

1York University, 2Hospital for Sick Children and 3University of British Columbia

All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rebecca Pillai Riddell, PhD, C. Psych, Department of Psychology, York University, Atkinson, Room 508, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3. E-mail: rpr{at}yorku.ca


   Abstract

Objective To examine whether caregiver judgments of infant pain would vary systematically with different infant caregiver groups and infant age. Methods  A total of 123 caregivers (41 parents, 41 in patient nurses, 41 pediatricians) viewed videotapes of the vigorous behavioral responses of healthy infants (aged 2, 4, 6, 12, and 18 months) to a routine immunization injection and provided ratings of both the affective distress and pain intensity observed. Results A principal components analysis of affective and intensity ratings yielded a weighted pain summary score for each injection event. Older infants were attributed significantly more pain than younger infants, even though the vigor of the behavioral reactions was experimentally controlled across age groups. A profile analysis contrasting observer groups indicated that pediatricians attributed significantly lower levels of pain than parents, while nurses were intermediate to the other groups, not significantly differing from either group. These systematic differences in judgments were consistent across infant age groups. Conclusions The findings reveal systematic sources of significant variations in observer judgments of infant pain. Despite an absence of differences in the behavioral reactions of the children, both the type of caregiver and their knowledge of the child's age systematically influenced attributions of pain to infants. This work suggests the important role of caregiver role variation and perceived developmental maturity as determinants of infant pain judgments and highlights potential areas of difficulty in controlling the unnecessary suffering of infants.

Key words: infant pain; judgment; nurse; parents; physician..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
R. de Cassia Xavier Balda and R. Guinsburg
Perceptions of Neonatal Pain
NeoReviews, December 1, 2007; 8(12): e533 - e542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.